← Credibility Leaderboard · News & Media Literacy

Is “Best of - How misinformation spreads” worth watching?

by Stanford University School of Engineering · Uploaded Jul 2023

Substance score88out of 100Watch

Worth watching — it scored high on substance.

The verdict

The video features a Stanford professor discussing peer-reviewed research and methodology, explicitly citing the limitations of their data and the distinction between correlation and causation.

Key points

  • Requires an interest in data science, social network analysis, or computational social science.
  • False information spreads faster and more broadly than true information, but when controlling for cascade size, the structural 'shape' of the spread is remarkably similar.
  • Computational audits of unstructured data (like parole videos) can reveal systemic inconsistencies that are otherwise invisible to human review.

About this topic

Explainers about how news and misinformation work — judged on what the transcript actually argues, not the channel’s reputation.

How this score was produced

This is one automated reading of the video's transcript — a substance score judging specificity, sourcing, balance, accuracy and depth, not a claim about the creator's honesty or expertise. It's the same check anyone can run on a URL, so it's reproducible: paste this video into the free Credibility Checker and you'll get the same number.

Get this verdict on every video you browse

Clarion runs this same check automatically as you browse YouTube. Hover any thumbnail for a 0–100 score, a Watch / Skim / Skip call, and three takeaways — before you click.

Coming soon

Get early access

One email the day Clarion launches — plus a free month of Pro for founding users.